| Author |
Message |
|
jeffhoy
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@  Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:41 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:26 pm
Posts: 98
|
Swift wrote: THECubReporter wrote:
so what load... 100A?? or 50C??? what load would you like to see???
I want to see the largest amperage discharge possible. What's the capacity of these packs? If they are 5800 mah, then 50C would be real nice. Actually, I'd like to see at minimum 50c. At most, whatever the packs label says if it's over 50c.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
CRAIGSASYLUM
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:42 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 75
Location: rantoul
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Swift
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:42 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:58 pm
Posts: 40
Location: Extreme W. IL
|
You Got it... 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jeffhoy
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:43 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:26 pm
Posts: 98
|
THECubReporter wrote: jeffhoy wrote: THECubReporter wrote: so what load... 100A?? or 50C??? what load would you like to see??? 50c so around 290 amps??  Hell yes. At least.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
THECubReporter
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:43 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:22 pm
Posts: 103
Location: Chicago Illinois
|
|
the HobbyKing 6,000 mah pack is rated for 65-130C discharge........ so 780 amps... that is a lot of light bulbs!! LOL
_________________
Staff Pundit
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jeffhoy
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:44 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:26 pm
Posts: 98
|
THECubReporter wrote: the HobbyKing 6,000 mah pack is rated for 65-130C discharge........ so 780 amps... that is a lot of light bulbs!! LOL And a lot of melting battery leads and connectors.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
THECubReporter
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:44 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:22 pm
Posts: 103
Location: Chicago Illinois
|
|
so what information are you hoping to gain when we discharge them at 780 amps??
_________________
Staff Pundit
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jeffhoy
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:45 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:26 pm
Posts: 98
|
|
Any that survive their stated ratings get a point. Not meeting the label is instant DQ.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CRAIGSASYLUM
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:45 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 75
Location: rantoul
|
|
7x 100a +a 75 = 775 good enough
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Swift
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:47 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:58 pm
Posts: 40
Location: Extreme W. IL
|
THECubReporter wrote: so what information are you hoping to gain when we discharge them at 780 amps?? Call 'em out on their advertising. Are they full of it or not.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jeffhoy
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:48 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:26 pm
Posts: 98
|
Swift wrote: THECubReporter wrote: so what information are you hoping to gain when we discharge them at 780 amps?? Call 'em out on their advertising. Are they full of it or not. Bingo.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
THECubReporter
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:48 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:22 pm
Posts: 103
Location: Chicago Illinois
|
jeffhoy wrote: Any that survive their stated ratings get a point. Not meeting the label is instant DQ. what are the odds any of them live after testing at their rated "C" discharge??? LOL
_________________
Staff Pundit
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jeffhoy
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:49 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:26 pm
Posts: 98
|
THECubReporter wrote: jeffhoy wrote: Any that survive their stated ratings get a point. Not meeting the label is instant DQ. what are the odds any of them live after testing at their rated "C" discharge??? LOL Well, that will just make the final conclusion page that much more interesting, won't it?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Swift
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:49 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:58 pm
Posts: 40
Location: Extreme W. IL
|
CRAIGSASYLUM wrote: 7x 100a +a 75 = 775 good enough At these amperes I'd go with 8 x 100 = 800 and forget the small stuff.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
THECubReporter
|
Post subject: Re: @@@ Official Weds Night 2.21 SmackTalk'n Thread @@@ Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:52 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:22 pm
Posts: 103
Location: Chicago Illinois
|
|
if I thought any of them would live I'd be all for the super high current discharge... but if they all die I don't see the point...
_________________
Staff Pundit
|
|
| |
|
|
|
