<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Futaba Drone Transmitter	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.bigsquidrc.com/futaba-drone-transmitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.bigsquidrc.com/futaba-drone-transmitter/</link>
	<description>For Bashers, By Bashers!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2014 03:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: renato popo		</title>
		<link>https://www.bigsquidrc.com/futaba-drone-transmitter/#comment-22657</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[renato popo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2014 03:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigsquidrc.com/?p=54852#comment-22657</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[saller!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saller!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ez-e from baltimore		</title>
		<link>https://www.bigsquidrc.com/futaba-drone-transmitter/#comment-22609</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ez-e from baltimore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 14:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigsquidrc.com/?p=54852#comment-22609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If we keep calling them &quot;drones&quot; we only perpetuate the media driven hysteria that imply&#039;s that we are building and flying something nefarious and or similar to the military style DRONES that have a well established negative reputation already, and rightfully so given the circumstances.
 With having this country spoon fed misinformation and sound bites long enough to appeal to only the shortest of attention spans through our televisions, shouldn&#039;t it be a more wise decision from manufactures and hobby news resources to perpetuate the proper connotation that we are flying model aircraft and only that. 
If we need some stupid buzzword to represent our models and make them more marketable and appealing to your standard goofball off the street looking to fly a &quot;drone&quot; how about unmanned aerial vehicle or just call it a tactical unmanned aerial vehicle and market it to people with more guns than brain cells. /rant off..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we keep calling them &#8220;drones&#8221; we only perpetuate the media driven hysteria that imply&#8217;s that we are building and flying something nefarious and or similar to the military style DRONES that have a well established negative reputation already, and rightfully so given the circumstances.<br />
 With having this country spoon fed misinformation and sound bites long enough to appeal to only the shortest of attention spans through our televisions, shouldn&#8217;t it be a more wise decision from manufactures and hobby news resources to perpetuate the proper connotation that we are flying model aircraft and only that.<br />
If we need some stupid buzzword to represent our models and make them more marketable and appealing to your standard goofball off the street looking to fly a &#8220;drone&#8221; how about unmanned aerial vehicle or just call it a tactical unmanned aerial vehicle and market it to people with more guns than brain cells. /rant off..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: www.bigsquidrc.com @ 2026-09-12 06:06:19 by W3 Total Cache
-->